Time and again spirited discussions occur on internet fora regarding an study of the status of a variety of jyotish parameters, including chara dasha (a signal based longitudinal period astrofactor) and also karakamsha (that the navamsha in which the atmakaraka (most advanced planet in longitude) is placed. As characteristically happens, several of the discussants began to branch into other negative discussions which had nothing to do with the original questions or topics along with some even became a bit resolved and emotional, as also usually happens on the internet where attention spans of weeks and days have been required so as to get to the underside of things and where some times a topic is being discussed on many unique boards and lots of topics simultaneously on a particular board! As too is typical, nothing was really resolved, and a few of the regulars began expressing their frustrations about such topics coming up again and again and directing people to writings etc.. Alas, the yahoo forums/fora are such that just limited hunting of previous messages will be possible without losing most of one's hair, and also the archives are often maintained onto another yahoo site therefore that this does not help matters when everybody wants is to find yourself a quick overview of what others are already using and when possible their good reasons for embracing a certain position! This latter brings forth more gall than good information though the intention of the person posing the question may have been very commendable and not in any way confrontational. Knowing Jyotish doesn't protect one from harbouring Neurotic traits!
Somewhere, over the path with this former quest, yet another issue got endured and began questioning the use of varga kundalis or even varga chakras, divisional horoscopes that are the core of jyotish and have been used by tropical astrologers at the form of harmonic graphs. This is some thing that is utilized in Jyotish going back to almost the first memories of the earliest members at the forum who eventually admitted to such being the situation. I myself, though myself not that senior, have seen horoscopes which were drawn from the century before where the jyotishi had attracted the rashi chakra and navamsha and dashamsha and therefore forth and much more to the point had commented on these charts in his own reading. kalyan matka panel chart So, at the least a lot of people were utilizing varga-charts even a couple of 100 decades ago and possibly even prior to those times.
Somewhere throughout the discussion, in just one of these lists, one of the associates made available a post in which the writer had voiced thoughts to the contrary, i.e., vargas must not be utilised at a graph format. A conversation ensued which sidestepped the more important and relevant matter of the practical merits of using of navamsha varga being an secondary chart. A few individuals requested for accusations in classics that indicates that ancient jyotishis urged of varga chakras. The discussants emphasized that ONLY rashi chakra must be used along with varga placements should just be used for ascertaining the advantages of planets etc..
Nowadays, those who have studied BPHS might know, that 16 vargas had been defined by the Sage starting with rashi ehich is also known as'kshetra' (field or area) etc. This was really true and a positive step ahead of the conversation. There were also parallel discussions going on which were rehashing that BPHS wasn't original and was not a good classic and published by one or even a group of'latterday saints' [my term, not the initial poster's!] In Jyotish and so can't be treated as a classic. Apparently, there was some support to this could possibly be similarly expected if somebody were to create a comment that Jyotish had been nothing but a derivative of astrology that the army that was included with Alexander brought to India. An issue that's been known to bring even untoward jyotishis out on the"warpath!"
To those who have been still interested and intrigued by this, there appeared to be just two streams of thought prevailing:
(a) Only Rashi horoscopes should be used. Additional varga kundalis were the item of corrupt understanding of the classics - which themselves many concur might not have endured in pristine shape [although some of these have thankfully survived in fairly great shape1]. I do not know how a lot of the iceberg postulate is established facts and how much is wishful fiction. According to the purists with the particular stream of thought, vargas MUST simply be used as measures of quantitative and qualitative strength of planets and also to that consideration of their deities and primal forces those represent however, perhaps not at the form of a horoscope and certainly no significant consideration has to be given to aspects along with bhava considerations. Just for clarity, they would maintain, for instance, that while the next house lord in navamsha is an important index, the fact it is placed in the 2 nd navamsha varga from the navamsha lagna (essentially in 2 nd dwelling in navamsha chart) isn't important.
(b) Irrespective of if explicitly clarified or maybe not, the other stream of believing asserts that varga kundalis have a significant role to play in Jyotish and potentially are of significant utility in differentiating primary mandates matters pertaining to the prescription given by sages. To put it differently, navamsha graph, for example, would hold significant influence on topics of marriage and spouse, while saptamsha chart are of import from the study of kids in a particular nativity's reading. These Vargas ought to be analyzed in a graph format.
I don't really recall anybody in the'camp (b)' saying that the first part of (a) is not correct, especially, the Varga positions have to be contemplated, by itself, for an examination of strength and caliber of an entire planet as prescribed over the Jyotish frame. There appeared to be a few different individuals who totally denied the veracity of idea flow (b) and a few were a little taciturn about it, perhaps to avoid acrimony and getting ensnared from the controversy. Or perhaps there were some other reasons, known only for them.