Your slogan here

kalyan matka panel chart 4618

kalyan matka panel chart

Time and again spirited discussions happen on internet fora pertaining to a examination of the status of a variety of jyotish parameters, including chara dasha (a sign based planetary period astrofactor) and karakamsha (the navamsha in which the atmakaraka (most advanced planet in longitude) is placed. As characteristically happens, a few of the discussants began to branch into other side discussions that had nothing more to do with all the initial questions or topics and some even became a bit exercised and emotional, as also often happens on the internet where attention spans of days and weeks are demanded in order to get to the underside of matters and where sometimes a topic will be discussed on several distinct boards and many topics simultaneously on a particular board! As too is average, nothing was resolved, and some of the regulars began expressing their frustrations about such topics coming up again and again and directing people to archives . Alas, the ya-hoo forums/fora are such that merely limited hunting of past messages will be possible without losing most of one's hair, and the archives are often maintained on yet another yahoo site so this does not help things when everybody wants is to have a quick overview of what others are using and when possible their good reasons for embracing a certain position! This latter brings about more gall than good information though the intention of the person posing the question may have been quite noble and maybe not at all confrontational.

Somewhere, along the path with the former quest, still another issue got born and began questioning the use of varga kundalis or even varga chakras, divisional horoscopes which are the core of jyotish and have already been used by tropical astrologers at the kind of harmonic graphs. Now this really is something which is found in Jyotish going straight back to almost the very first memories of the oldest members in the discussion who eventually confessed to this type of case. I myself, though myself maybe not that mature, have experienced horoscopes which were attracted in the century before last where the jyotishi had attracted the rashi chakra and navamsha and dashamsha and so forth and much more importantly had commented on these graphs in his reading. kalyan chart Therefore, at the least a lot of people were utilizing varga-charts a handful of 100 decades ago and possibly maybe even just before these times.

Somewhere through the conversation, in another of the lists, a number of those associates made available a post in that the author had expressed thoughts to the contrary, i.e., vargas must not be used in a chart format. A discussion ensued which side stepped the more important and pertinent matter of these technical merits of utilizing navamsha varga being a secondary graph. A few individuals requested for accusations in classics which indicates that ancient jyotishis advocated of varga chakras. The discussants emphasized that ONLY rashi chakra must be used along with varga placements should only be useful for ascertaining the strengths of planets etc..

Nowadays, people who have studied BPHS would know, that 16 vargas had been characterized by the Sage you start with rashi ehich is known as'kshetra' (field or area) and so on. This was indeed true and a positive step forward in the conversation. There were parallel discussions going on which were rehashing that BPHS wasn't original and was not even a timeless and compiled by one or a set of'latter day saints' [my word, not the initial poster!] In Jyotish and therefore cannot be treated like being a classic. Obviously, there was some support to this could be similarly expected if some one were to make a comment that Jyotish had been only a derivative of Babylonian astrology that the army that was included with Alexander brought to India. A topic that's been recognized to attract even sedate jyotishis out on the"warpath!"

To individuals who were still interested and intrigued by this, there appeared to be just two streams of thought prevailing:

(a) Just Rashi horoscopes should be used. Additional varga kundalis were the item of corrupt comprehension of the classics which themselves many concur may not have lived in pure shape [though some of them have mercifully survived in fairly great shape1]. Underlying this is the belief some may harbor that, alike the iceberg, available Jyotish is only 1/10th of their entire human body as the submerged 9/10th is largely lost and partially hidden in the secret chambers of paramparas plus a number of the secret documents which you can get but jealously safeguarded by the custodian families. I don't know how a lot of this iceberg postulate is established facts and how much is wishful fiction. As stated by the purists of this flow of thought, vargas MUST only be applied as measures of qualitative and quantitative strength of planets and also because of your consideration of this deities and primal forces those represent however, maybe not in the form of a horoscope and clearly no serious consideration must be directed at aspects along with bhava considerations. Only for clarity, they would assert, for instance, that while the 2 nd dwelling lord at navamsha is a significant indicator, the simple fact that it is placed in the second navamsha varga from the navamsha lagna (essentially in second house in navamsha chart) isn't significant.

(b) Regardless of if specifically described or not, the other stream of believing asserts that varga kundalis have an important role to play at Jyotish and possibly are of significant utility in discerning primary mandates matters regarding the prescription written by sages. To put it differently, navamsha chart, as an instance, would hold significant sway over topics of marriage and spouse, whilst saptamsha graph would be of similar import at the examination of children in a specific nativity's reading. These Vargas ought to be analyzed in a graph format.

There seemed to be a few other people who entirely denied that the veracity of idea stream (b) and also a few were a bit taciturn about any of this, perhaps to prevent acrimony and becoming ensnared from the controversy. Or there were some other factors, known only to them.



Report Resource: http://EzineArticles.com/1822810